Discuss the nature of profit and critically examine Professor Knight’s theory of profit


Profit may be defined as the reward earned by the entrepreneur for his two fold services to production, namely management and risk-taking. The entrepreneur plans the business, hires the services of land, labour and capital and organizes then to his best ability. He pays rent, wages and capital at fixed rate. What remains after paying those is called Profit. The amount of profit is thus uncertain.

According to Professor Knight, profit is the reward for uncertainty-bearing and not for risk, taking in a business. According to him there are two kinds of risks which entrepreneur has to bear? Some risks are of such a nature that they can be anticipated to a fair degree of accuracy e.g. the risk of death, accident etc and so can be insured in return for premium. The entrepreneur can include the payment made in the form of premium in the total cost of production. So such risk which can be calculated and inscribed should not entitle entrepreneur to a profit. 

On the other hand, there are some risks which are unpredictable and unforeseen and so they are non-insurable. For instance, if the demand for product of entrepreneur suddenly comes down due to change sin fashions, tastes etc, then he may no be able to cover his total costs of production. Such risks which are unforeseen and cannot be statistically measured are called by Knight as uncertainty-bearing risks. Profits according to him are the reward of uncertainty-bearing rather than risk taking which is insurable.

Criticism:
Professor Knight’s Theory of profit can be criticized on the following grounds.

1. The total profits which an entrepreneur receives cannot be attributed solely to the element of uncertainty in a business. He performs other functions also such as coordinating, bargaining and innovation in the business. So he must be paid for these services also.

2. It is not simply due to uncertainty bearing that the supply of entrepreneur is restricted. There are other factors also which influence the supply of the entrepreneur. For instance lack of knowledge, lack of capital, lack of opportunity etc do restrict the supply of an entrepreneur in a business.

3. Uncertainty bearing can not be elevated to the status of a factor of production. It is an element of real costs which means exertion, abstinence, sacrifice etc as distinguished from money cost. Cost is not generally measured in terms of real cost. We know that capital is a factor of production but no abstinence that is needed to have capital.

4. Knight’s theory does not seem to have much relevance to the real world. Business combines to estimate profits ex-ante in defiance of this theory. This theory has been criticised as heavily insulated from empirical testing and empirical relevance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Dynamic Theory of Profit

Image
Clark's Dynamic Theory of Profit And Its Criticism The Dynamic Theory of Profit is associated with the name of an American Economist, J. B. Clark. In the world of reality, according to J. B. Clark, profit arises only in a dynamic economy. An economy is said to be dynamic when there is a change in population growth or change in the method of production or a change in the consumer’s wants, etc. A society which is without these changes is called a static society. In a static society, only monopoly profits continue to exist. All other economic profits are gradually eliminated by competition. In a dynamic society, an entrepreneur is always confronted with continuous unpredictable changes in demand for his product. The variation in demand may take place due to changes in fashions, tastes, the standard of living, distribution of income, population, new inventions, international repercussions, technological advances, etc. A prudent entrepreneur will always keep an eye on future demand
Read more

Compare the anatomy of Bifacial and Isobilateral leaves

BIFACIAL LEAF: It is also called dorsiventral leaf. This leaf is more strongly illuminated on upper surface than on lower surface. This unequal illumination induces a difference in the internal structure between upper and lower sides. Its internal structure shows: (1)        Upper Epidermis This is single layer of cells with thick cuticle which checks excessive evaporation of water from the surface. It does not contains chloroplasts, stomata are also absent. (2)        Lower Epidermis This is also single layer but with a thin cuticle. It bears many stomata, two guard cells of which contain some chloroplast, none are present in the epidermal cells. Internal to each stomata is large cavity called respiratory cavity. Lower epidermis of leaf is meant for exchange of gases (oxygen and carbon dioxide) between the atmosphere and the plant body. Excess water also evaporates from lower epidermis. (3)        Mesophyll The ground tissue lying between upper epidermis and th
Read more

osmoregulation in terrestrial and aquatic animals

Mechanism of osmoregulation is very important for all groups of animals whether inhibting land or water. Unlike plant cells, animal cells when placed in hypotonic solution burst due to the continuous absorption of water. On the contrary they would shrink and die if constantly placed in hypertonic solution. Normally uptake and loss of water are in balance for proper survival of cell. (1)        Osmoregulation in terrestrial animals: Terrestrial animals are more likely to loose water by evaporation through their permeable surfaces exposed to amsophere. Among various animal groups only Arthropods and vertebrates became the most successful land dwellers. They have developed number of strategies to maintain osmoregulation of their body fluid. (a) Water proof external coverings: To prevent water loss through external surfaces, vertebrates like reptiles, birds and mammals have water proof keratinized epidermis. Similarly the insects have developed external water proof layer called
Read more