Discuss the nature of profit and critically examine Professor Knight’s theory of profit
Profit may be
defined as the reward earned by the entrepreneur for his two fold services to
production, namely management and risk-taking. The entrepreneur plans the business,
hires the services of land, labour and capital and organizes then to his best
ability. He pays rent, wages and capital at fixed rate. What remains after
paying those is called Profit. The amount of profit is thus uncertain.
According to
Professor Knight, profit is the reward for uncertainty-bearing and not for
risk, taking in a business. According to him there are two kinds of risks which
entrepreneur has to bear? Some risks are of such a nature that they can be
anticipated to a fair degree of accuracy e.g. the risk of death, accident etc
and so can be insured in return for premium. The entrepreneur can include the
payment made in the form of premium in the total cost of production. So such
risk which can be calculated and inscribed should not entitle entrepreneur to a
profit.
On the other hand, there are some risks which are unpredictable and
unforeseen and so they are non-insurable. For instance, if the demand for
product of entrepreneur suddenly comes down due to change sin fashions, tastes
etc, then he may no be able to cover his total costs of production. Such risks
which are unforeseen and cannot be statistically measured are called by Knight
as uncertainty-bearing risks. Profits according to him are the reward of
uncertainty-bearing rather than risk taking which is insurable.
Criticism:
Professor
Knight’s Theory of profit can be criticized on the following grounds.
1. The total
profits which an entrepreneur receives cannot be attributed solely to the
element of uncertainty in a business. He performs other functions also such as
coordinating, bargaining and innovation in the business. So he must be paid for
these services also.
2. It is not
simply due to uncertainty bearing that the supply of entrepreneur is
restricted. There are other factors also which influence the supply of the
entrepreneur. For instance lack of knowledge, lack of capital, lack of
opportunity etc do restrict the supply of an entrepreneur in a business.
3. Uncertainty
bearing can not be elevated to the status of a factor of production. It is an
element of real costs which means exertion, abstinence, sacrifice etc as
distinguished from money cost. Cost is not generally measured in terms of real
cost. We know that capital is a factor of production but no abstinence that is
needed to have capital.
4. Knight’s
theory does not seem to have much relevance to the real world. Business
combines to estimate profits ex-ante in defiance of this theory. This theory
has been criticised as heavily insulated from empirical testing and empirical
relevance.
Comments
Post a Comment